PRISM-VLM - Sycophancy Resistance: leaderboard

The sycophancy-resistance axis of PRISM-VLM (NAVER, 2026): after a correct first answer the model faces three turns of pressure, a request to reconsider, an expression of doubt and a plausible wrong hint. Share of initially correct answers kept through all three turns, in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Per-axis mean score (%; share of turn-0-correct answers held through three turns of pressure ending in a plausible wrong hint; over PRISM-VLM's 6,238 items recycled from 15 public VLM benchmarks (five seeds of 100 items per benchmark); GPT-5 (low effort) synthesizes the perturbations and grades the open-ended axes; each model at the lowest reasoning effort its provider exposes, temperature 0). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 42 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 0.8B (Non-reasoning)81#8139 (Qwen 3.5 0.8B)
2Nova 2.0 Lite78.3#1133
3Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning)76.4#438 (Grok 4 Fast)
4Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite74#958
5Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct71.5#982
6Gemini 3 Flash (Minimal)71#159 (Gemini 3 Flash)
7Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct70.4#1281
8Qwen 3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)65.6#4849 (Qwen 3.5 2B)
9Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)64.7#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
10GPT-5 Mini (Minimal)58.8#349 (GPT-5 Mini)
11Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Minimal)54.1#363 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite)
12GPT-5 Nano (Minimal)46.6#888 (GPT-5 Nano)
13Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-251245.6#2592
14Qwen 3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)44.6#1180 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
15Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-251243.4#1866

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=prism-vlm-sycophancy-resistance · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.