PRISM-VLM - Quality: leaderboard

The quality axis of PRISM-VLM (NAVER, 2026): accuracy of compact vision-language models on the original, unperturbed questions of 6,238 items recycled from 15 public VLM benchmarks, graded against the source answers by a GPT-5 judge. Score in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Per-axis mean score (%; base accuracy on the recycled question, judged against the source gold answer; over PRISM-VLM's 6,238 items recycled from 15 public VLM benchmarks (five seeds of 100 items per benchmark); GPT-5 (low effort) synthesizes the perturbations and grades the open-ended axes; each model at the lowest reasoning effort its provider exposes, temperature 0). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2027. 42 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Flash (Minimal)74.1#159 (Gemini 3 Flash)
2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Minimal)71.3#363 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite)
3Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)69.9#803 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
4GPT-4.1 Mini69.7#775
5GPT-5.4 Mini69.2#389
6Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)68.9#452 (Gemini 2.5 Flash)
7Gemini 2.0 Flash68.6#702
8Qwen 3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)68.2#1180 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
9Claude Haiku 4.566.8#568
10Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct66.5#982
11Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite66.5#1032
12GPT-5 Mini (Minimal)66.4#349 (GPT-5 Mini)
13Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct66.1#1281
14Nova 2.0 Lite66.1#1133
15Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite64.6#958

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=prism-vlm-quality · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.