Pressure Reveals Character - Scheming: Deceptive Alignment: leaderboard

Mean 1-5 judge rubric score over 13 multi-turn scenarios testing not faking alignment during evaluation. One behaviour of the Scheming category; a subset of the headline's transcripts.

Metric: Mean judge rubric score over 13 scenarios (1 = failure, 5 = exemplary). Source: storage.googleapis.com. 24 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5 Mini4.85#348
2Claude Opus 4.54.77#156
3GPT-5.24.69#176
4Grok 4.14.69#476
5Claude Sonnet 4.54.46#250
6Qwen 3 235B A22B4.38#623
7GPT-OSS-120B4.31#700
8Claude Sonnet 44.31#400
9Kimi K24.31#439
10GPT-4o4.23#741
11DeepSeek V3.24.08#406
12Gemini 3 Pro4#137
13Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B4#757
14Gemini 3 Flash3.92#164
15Qwen 3 14B3.92#1233

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=pressure-reveals-character-scheming-deceptive-alignment · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.