PreAct-Bench: leaderboard

PreAct-Bench (2026) tests predictive monitoring: a model reads an agent trajectory with a hidden objective, cut just before its first overtly unethical step, and predicts whether it will turn unethical; ethical and unethical trajectories are paired per task. The board is the F1 score in percent with the full prefix, averaged over five domains; higher is better.

Metric: Prefix Foresight F1 with the full prefix (PFF(100), binary F1 of the unethical class, 0-1 scaled to %): given an agent trajectory truncated just before its first overt unethical step, the monitor predicts whether the trajectory will turn unethical; paired ethical and unethical trajectories per task; default generation parameters; higher is better; mean over the five domains (200 trajectories each). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemma 3 27B83.9#1631
2GPT-5.481.5#123
3Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct79.6#1089
4Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)72.7#1830 (Qwen 3 8B)
5Gemma 3 4B66.7#5064
6Qwen 3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)66.7#8342 (Qwen 3 0.6B)
7Qwen 3 8B (Thinking)62.7#1830 (Qwen 3 8B)
8GPT-4o61.3#741
9Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)58.8#761
10Qwen 3 0.6B (Thinking)58.5#8342 (Qwen 3 0.6B)
11Qwen 3 4B 2507 Instruct51#2163
12Qwen 3 4B 2507 (Thinking)49.3#1390
13GPT-OSS-20B49.1#1147
14GPT-OSS-120B45.5#700

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=preact-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.