POLAR-Bench: leaderboard

LLM agents increasingly have access to private user data and act on the user's behalf when interacting with third-party systems. The user defines what may and must not be shared, and the agent must robustly follow that intent even when third-party systems behave adversarially. We introduce POLAR-Bench (Policy-aware adversarial Benchmark), in which a trusted model with a privacy policy and a task c

Metric: Overall Mean (self-reported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Around August 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GLM-5.194.34#97
2GPT-5.492.33#79
3Gemma 4 31B91.2#200
4Gemma 4 E4B90.87#767
5DeepSeek V3.190.81#264
6Llama 3.3 70B86.23#579
7Kimi K2.585.4#144
8Gemma 3 27B83.16#607
9DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B81.19#655
10Qwen 3 32B80.87#443
11GLM-4.7 Flash80#509
12Gemma 4 E2B79.74#1070
13Ministral 3 8B76.12#687
14GPT-OSS-120B74.62#341
15Ministral 3 14B71.96#650

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=polar-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.