PodBench - Thinking Mode - Instruction Following: leaderboard

PodBench's instruction-following stage (Claude-4.5-Opus checks a requirement checklist it derives from each instruction, items scored 0, 0.5 or 1, normalized to 0-100, higher is better) for open models run with reasoning enabled, with the reasoning trace removed before judging. Tencent, ACL 2026.

Metric: Instruction Following (0-100; judge-derived checklist, items scored 0/0.5/1). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 235B A22B (Thinking)94.32#622 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
2DeepSeek R1 052894.27#425
3Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)93.78#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
4Qwen 3 14B (Reasoning)91.79#1235 (Qwen 3 14B)
5Qwen 3 30B A3B (Thinking)89.88#1124 (Qwen 3 30B A3B)
6Qwen 3 8B (Thinking)88.45#1838 (Qwen 3 8B)
7DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B85.67#2101
8Qwen 3 4B (Reasoning)83.04#2297 (Qwen 3 4B)
9DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B80.12#1780
10DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B66.94#6773
11Qwen 3 1.7B (Thinking)62.65#5551 (Qwen 3 1.7B)
12DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B42.59#8045

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=podbench-thinking-mode-instruction-following · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.