PodBench - Thinking Mode: leaderboard

PodBench score, the mean of Claude-4.5-Opus instruction-following and script-quality judgments (0-100, higher is better), for open models run with reasoning enabled: the hybrid Qwen3 models with thinking switched on, DeepSeek-R1-0528 and the R1 distills. The reasoning trace is removed before judging, and the 800 Chinese and English podcast-script queries are the same as on PodBench; Tencent, ACL 2026.

Metric: PodBench Score (0-100; mean of instruction following and script quality). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek R1 052877.71#425
2Qwen 3 235B A22B (Thinking)77.37#622 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
3Qwen 3 32B (Thinking)76.85#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
4Qwen 3 14B (Reasoning)74.33#1235 (Qwen 3 14B)
5Qwen 3 30B A3B (Thinking)72.33#1124 (Qwen 3 30B A3B)
6Qwen 3 8B (Thinking)71.17#1838 (Qwen 3 8B)
7DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B68.49#2101
8Qwen 3 4B (Reasoning)67.1#2297 (Qwen 3 4B)
9DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B64.09#1780
10DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B56.08#6773
11Qwen 3 1.7B (Thinking)52.47#5551 (Qwen 3 1.7B)
12DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B39.4#8045

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=podbench-thinking-mode · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.