PodBench - Instruction Following: leaderboard

PodBench's first judging stage: for each of 800 Chinese and English podcast-script requests with source documents of up to 21K tokens, Claude-4.5-Opus derives an acceptance checklist of explicit and implied requirements (language, speaker count, focus, length) and scores every item 0, 0.5 or 1, normalized to 0-100, higher is better. Proprietary models and open models with thinking disabled; Tencent, ACL 2026.

Metric: Instruction Following (0-100; judge-derived checklist, items scored 0/0.5/1). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.596.58#244
2Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)96.09#111
3GPT-5.1 Instant95.52#437
4Qwen 3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)93.64#622 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
5DeepSeek V3 (0324)92.71#704
6Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)90.69#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
7GPT-4o89.43#741
8Qwen 3 14B (Non-reasoning)87.07#1235 (Qwen 3 14B)
9Qwen 3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)86.5#1124 (Qwen 3 30B A3B)
10Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct83.31#1093
11Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)80.79#1838 (Qwen 3 8B)
12Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct77.84#1216
13Qwen 3 4B (Non-reasoning)76.73#2297 (Qwen 3 4B)
14InternLM3-8B-Instruct73.95#2586
15Llama 4 Scout Instruct70.14#1532

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=podbench-instruction-following · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.