PM-LLM-Benchmark: leaderboard

Process mining prompts that supply event logs and process models as text, covering contextual understanding, conformance checking, model generation, querying, hypothesis generation, fairness and optimization. A judge model grades each of the 51 answers from 1 to 10 and the score is their sum divided by ten, so it tops out near 51 and higher is better. A diagram-reading category exists upstream but is excluded here.

Metric: Score. Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Around 2033. 171 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)40.2#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
2GPT-5.6 Sol (High)39.8#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
3Kimi K339.2#30
4GPT-5.6 Terra (High)38.4#41 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
5Kimi K2.637.8#104
6GPT-5.4 (xHigh)37.8#79 (GPT-5.4)
7GPT-5.5 (High)37.7#31 (GPT-5.5)
8DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731)37.7#78
9GPT-5.5 Pro37.7#17
10GPT-5.3 Codex (xHigh)37.3#69 (GPT-5.3 Codex)
11GPT-5.6 Luna (High)37.2#68 (GPT-5.6 Luna)
12GPT-5.4 (High)37#79 (GPT-5.4)
13GPT-5.5 (xHigh)36.9#31 (GPT-5.5)
14GPT-5.2 (xHigh)36.8#110 (GPT-5.2)
15DeepSeek V4 Pro36.4#102

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=pm-llm-benchmark · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.