PlanningBench: leaderboard

Planning is a fundamental capability for large language models (LLMs) because such complex tasks require models to coordinate goals, constraints, resources, and long-term consequences into executable and verifiable solutions. Existing planning benchmarks, however, usually treat planning data as fixed collections of instances rather than controllable generation targets. This limits scenario coverag

Metric: All-pass (%) (self-reported). Source: benchmarklist.com. Saturation forecast: Around March 2027. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.4 (xHigh)63.17#79 (GPT-5.4)
2GPT-5.4 (High)58.56#79 (GPT-5.4)
3GPT-5.4 (Medium)58.09#79 (GPT-5.4)
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)53.25#58
5Seed 2.0 Pro (High)44.33#118 (Seed 2.0 Pro)
6DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)37.13#205 (DeepSeek V3.2)
7Hy3-preview36.17#157
8Qwen 3.5 Plus (Thinking)34.03#125 (Qwen 3.5 Plus)
9DeepSeek R133.07#251
10Gemini 2.5 Pro31.7#152
11Seed 2.0 Pro (Medium)30.63#118 (Seed 2.0 Pro)
12DeepSeek V3.2 Exp29.27#234
13Seed 1.822.4#139
14Qwen 3 32B0.27#443
15Qwen 3 8B0#674

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=planningbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.