PlanBench-V - Scheme Evaluation: leaderboard
Metric: Mean score (out of 2) on judging the strengths and weaknesses of a planning proposal, implementation level; answers to expert-curated questions on Chinese territorial spatial planning maps are scored 0 to 2 by a GPT-4o-mini judge (temperature 0) against structured reference answers with annotated critical points; objective items use exact match or semantic similarity; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around December 2026. 17 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen 3.6 Plus | 1.62 |
| 2 | GPT-5.4 | 1.59 |
| 3 | Kimi K2.6 | 1.44 |
| 4 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | 1.44 |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 1.43 |
| 6 | GPT-4o | 1.22 |
| 7 | Qwen 3.6 Flash | 1.05 |
| 8 | Qwen 2 VL 7B | 0.86 |
| 9 | Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct | 0.8 |
| 10 | InternVL3-14B | 0.71 |
| 11 | GPT-4o Mini | 0.64 |
| 12 | InternVL3-8B | 0.63 |
| 13 | Qwen 2 VL 2B | 0.54 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=planbench-v-scheme-evaluation · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-09-29.