Plan-RewardBench - Error Recovery: leaderboard

Metric: Pairwise accuracy (%) on the 361 robust error-recovery pairs of the Plan-RewardBench chosen versus rejected agent trajectories (shared tool registry, multi-turn context, executed tool feedback), preference labels from a Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.1 judge panel with human audit; discriminative reward models score each trajectory, generative reward models and LLM judges choose between the pair; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Skywork-Reward-V2-Qwen3-8B75.35
2Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct74.93
3Qwen Plus73.75
4INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B69.78
5GPT-569.39
6Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct68.84
7Qwen 3 4B 2507 Instruct68.7
8Qwen Max68.63
9DeepSeek R168.01
10Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)67.31
11InternLM2-7B-Reward67.05
12DeepSeek V3.2 Exp66.76
13Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)66.48
14FsfairX-LLaMA3-RM-v0.165.1
15Skywork-Reward-V2-Llama-3.1-8B65.1

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=plan-rewardbench-error-recovery · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.