PIRA-Bench: leaderboard

Metric: Final score (%): average intent F1 on trajectories with actionable intents times the normalized false-positive score on pure-noise trajectories, on PIRA-Bench's 100 screenshot trajectories (mobile and desktop, each with noise frames and one of three user profiles); a Gemini-3-flash judge matches predicted intents to the human consensus intents; Naive setting (sliding window of 10 screenshots, prediction at the end); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2028. 4 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Seed 1.823.29#136
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)22.36#54
3Qwen 3.5 Plus21.18#123
4GPT-5.212.76#105

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=pira-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.