PhysAssistBench (Chinese): leaderboard

The Chinese version of PhysAssistBench (2026), a benchmark of LLMs as physician assistants: over 324 four-turn sessions built from MIMIC-IV records, the model answers underspecified physician requests by querying an EHR through FHIR tools and interviewing an agentic patient. Scored by the mean share of physician-validated rubric items passed, in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Mean rubric score (%, mRS) over the 1,296 Chinese turns (324 four-turn clinical sessions built from MIMIC-IV records: 4 scenarios by 3 data-richness tiers by 27 sessions); the model assists a physician with 18 FHIR EHR, patient-interview and control tools (at most 16 tool calls per turn) and each turn scores the fraction of binary rubric items a fixed GPT-5.4-mini judge marks passed; thinking enabled (GPT-5 series at high effort), temperature 0.2; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GLM-571.5#260
2Kimi K2.669.9#178
3Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking)69.9#79 (Claude Opus 4.7)
4Seed 1.868.7#242
5Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)68#94
6MiniMax-M2.766.8#518
7GPT-5.4 (High)65.9#123 (GPT-5.4)
8Qwen 3.5 35B A3B65.8#482
9GPT-5.4 Mini (High)61.5#389 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
10Qwen 3.5 27B61.4#359
11Qwen 3.5 9B58#803
12Qwen 3.5 4B47.4#1175

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=physassistbench-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.