Photonic PCFBench - Wavelength Comparison Paired: leaderboard

PCFBench v1 Appendix full results; 26 isolated tasks across six categories; temperature0.1, task-specific64–2048token budgets; native fractions/errors. Paired structure+field and Field-only contexts separate. Closed-loop success uses expert sign/magnitude constraints, not physical resimulation; Human Score mean of six dimensions/two experts on120samples. Source-disputed summary/appendix cells and unbound checkpoint variants withheld.

Metric: Accuracy. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct0.78#383
2Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct0.78#463
3Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct0.76#650
4Gemini 3 Flash0.76#103
5Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)0.75#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
6GPT-50.74#105
7Qwen 2 VL 72B Instruct0.74#551
8Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.71#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
9O30.69#132
10Qwen 3.5 9B0.69#391
11Qwen 3.5 122B A10B0.69#184
12Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct0.66#419
13Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)0.57#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
14O4 Mini0.56#185
15Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.55#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=photonic-pcfbench-wavelength-comparison-paired · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.