Photonic PCFBench - Wavelength Comparison Field: leaderboard

PCFBench v1 Appendix full results; 26 isolated tasks across six categories; temperature0.1, task-specific64–2048token budgets; native fractions/errors. Paired structure+field and Field-only contexts separate. Closed-loop success uses expert sign/magnitude constraints, not physical resimulation; Human Score mean of six dimensions/two experts on120samples. Source-disputed summary/appendix cells and unbound checkpoint variants withheld.

Metric: Accuracy. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct0.77#463
2Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct0.76#650
3Claude 3.5 Sonnet0.76#362
4Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct0.75#383
5Qwen 3.5 9B0.75#391
6Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct0.74#419
7Qwen 3.5 122B A10B0.74#184
8Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct0.73#280
9Gemini 3 Flash0.7#103
10Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)0.69#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
11GPT-50.67#105
12Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.64#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
13Qwen 3.5 27B0.62#192
14O30.62#132
15Qwen 2 VL 72B Instruct0.6#551

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=photonic-pcfbench-wavelength-comparison-field · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.