Photonic PCFBench - Simulation Code Quality: leaderboard

PCFBench v1 Appendix full results; 26 isolated tasks across six categories; temperature0.1, task-specific64–2048token budgets; native fractions/errors. Paired structure+field and Field-only contexts separate. Closed-loop success uses expert sign/magnitude constraints, not physical resimulation; Human Score mean of six dimensions/two experts on120samples. Source-disputed summary/appendix cells and unbound checkpoint variants withheld.

Metric: Quality. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 30 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-51#105
2GPT-4.1 Mini1#363
3GPT-4.11#258
4Gemini 3 Flash1#103
5GPT-5 Mini1#193
6O31#132
7Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct1#463
8Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)1#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
9Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)1#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
10GPT-4o1#357
11GPT-4o Mini1#598
12Qwen-VL-Max1#475
13Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)1#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
14O4 Mini1#185
15Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct0.99#383

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=photonic-pcfbench-simulation-code-quality · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.