Photonic PCFBench - Report Completeness: leaderboard

PCFBench v1 Appendix full results; 26 isolated tasks across six categories; temperature0.1, task-specific64–2048token budgets; native fractions/errors. Paired structure+field and Field-only contexts separate. Closed-loop success uses expert sign/magnitude constraints, not physical resimulation; Human Score mean of six dimensions/two experts on120samples. Source-disputed summary/appendix cells and unbound checkpoint variants withheld.

Metric: Completeness. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around September 2027. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Grok 40.71#189
2Grok 4.10.69#239
3Gemini 3 Flash0.68#103
4Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)0.67#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
5Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.66#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
6O30.65#132
7Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)0.64#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
8GPT-50.63#105
9Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-25120.63#663
10Qwen 3.5 122B A10B0.62#184
11Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.62#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
12GPT-4.10.61#258
13Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct0.61#280
14GPT-5 Mini0.61#193
15Qwen 3.5 27B0.61#192

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=photonic-pcfbench-report-completeness · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.