Photonic PCFBench - Refactor Syntax: leaderboard

PCFBench v1 Appendix full results; 26 isolated tasks across six categories; temperature0.1, task-specific64–2048token budgets; native fractions/errors. Paired structure+field and Field-only contexts separate. Closed-loop success uses expert sign/magnitude constraints, not physical resimulation; Human Score mean of six dimensions/two experts on120samples. Source-disputed summary/appendix cells and unbound checkpoint variants withheld.

Metric: Syntax correctness. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct1#650
2Claude 3.5 Sonnet1#362
3Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct1#383
4Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct1#463
5Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)0.99#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
6GPT-4o Mini0.99#598
7Gemini 3 Flash0.99#103
8O30.99#132
9Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.99#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
10Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)0.98#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
11GPT-50.98#105
12Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.98#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
13GPT-4.10.97#258
14GPT-5 Mini0.97#193
15O4 Mini0.95#185

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=photonic-pcfbench-refactor-syntax · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.