Photonic PCFBench - Mechanism Diagnosis Paired: leaderboard

PCFBench v1 Appendix full results; 26 isolated tasks across six categories; temperature0.1, task-specific64–2048token budgets; native fractions/errors. Paired structure+field and Field-only contexts separate. Closed-loop success uses expert sign/magnitude constraints, not physical resimulation; Human Score mean of six dimensions/two experts on120samples. Source-disputed summary/appendix cells and unbound checkpoint variants withheld.

Metric: F1. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 21 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct0.7#650
2Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct0.5#419
3Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct0.5#383
4Qwen 3.5 122B A10B0.48#184
5Qwen 3.5 9B0.43#391
6Qwen 2 VL 72B Instruct0.38#551
7Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)0.35#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
8Qwen 3.5 27B0.32#192
9Gemini 3 Flash0.28#103
10Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.27#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
11Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct0.24#390
12Qwen-VL-Max0.24#475
13Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)0.2#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
14O30.19#132
15GPT-50.13#105

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=photonic-pcfbench-mechanism-diagnosis-paired · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.