Photonic PCFBench - Evidence Explanation Field: leaderboard

PCFBench v1 Appendix full results; 26 isolated tasks across six categories; temperature0.1, task-specific64–2048token budgets; native fractions/errors. Paired structure+field and Field-only contexts separate. Closed-loop success uses expert sign/magnitude constraints, not physical resimulation; Human Score mean of six dimensions/two experts on120samples. Source-disputed summary/appendix cells and unbound checkpoint variants withheld.

Metric: BERTScore F1. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 122B A10B0.38#184
2Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct0.36#463
3Grok 40.36#189
4Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)0.36#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
5Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-25120.35#663
6GPT-50.35#105
7Gemini 3 Flash0.35#103
8O30.35#132
9Qwen 3.5 27B0.34#192
10Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct0.34#280
11Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)0.34#87 (Claude Opus 4.5)
12Grok 4.10.33#239
13GPT-4o Mini0.32#598
14Qwen-VL-Max0.32#475
15Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct0.32#383

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=photonic-pcfbench-evidence-explanation-field · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.