PharmaBench: leaderboard

PharmaBench: Pass rate (%). PharmaBench: 120 tasks across eight synthetic drug programs, three runs per task, same unnamed open-source coding agent in an isolated shell/Python/document sandbox without internet. The original eleven-model report uses provider-default reasoning and an unnamed LLM rubric judge; late scoreboard top-up settings are not separately reported. Pass means every required criterion met and no penalty; mean is rubric reward averaged over runs then tasks. Group breakdowns retain the eleven-model report.

Metric: Pass rate (%). Source: www.micro1.ai. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Kimi K3.1 Pro (PharmaBench Run: late-topup-settings-unreported; coding-agent-unnamed)27.5
2Muse Wonder (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)17.2
3GPT-6 Astra (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)16.1
4Muse Spark 1.3 (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)13.9
5Claude Fable 5.1 (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)12.8
6Grok 4.6 (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)12.5
7Claude Sonnet 5.5 (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)11.4
8Claude Opus 5.5 (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)10.8
9Claude Opus 5 (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)9.7
10Muse Spark 1.1 (PharmaBench Run: provider-default; coding-agent-unnamed)9.7

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=pharmabench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-06.