PhantomBench - Terms (Place): leaderboard

PhantomBench (2026) asks language models about generated terms and entities that do not exist, verified absent from a 2.3-trillion-token corpus, and counts answers that invent content instead of abstaining, as labeled by a Gemini 2.5 Flash judge. This board is the hallucination rate in percent on 1,060 non-existent terms modeled on medical abbreviations, science glossaries and legal terms, when the prompt asks where it was discovered or took place, presupposing it exists; lower is better.

Metric: Hallucination rate (%): share of answers that do not abstain on the Phantom-T subset (1,060 generated non-existent terms modeled on medical abbreviations, science glossaries and legal terms), verified absent from the 2.3-trillion-token Dolma corpus, when the prompt asks where the concept was discovered or took place (presupposing it exists); a Gemini 2.5 Flash judge labels abstention; reasoning-model rates count only generations that reached a final answer; lower is better. Source: arxiv.org. 16 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 8B3.21#1830
2Qwen 3 14B3.3#1233
3Llama 3.1 8B Instruct3.58#4246
4Qwen 3 4B6.23#2281
5Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct6.51#2564
6Qwen 3 1.7B9.15#5520
7Gemma 2 9B (IT)12.83#2262
8Qwen 3 32B14.06#960
9Gemini 2.5 Pro15.75#266
10Gemini 2.5 Flash19.34#453
11Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)43.68#6653
12DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B58.97#1788
13GPT-OSS-20B (Low)72.68#1147 (GPT-OSS-20B)
14Gemma 3 12B (IT)85.28#1837

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=phantombench-terms-place · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.