PetriBench - Hard: leaderboard

Exact-match accuracy on PetriBench's Hard tier, where accuracy drops most and task-specific capability profiles separate. Reasoning effort is part of the row identity. Higher is better. Source: arxiv.org/abs/2609.19883.

Metric: Exact-Match Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around October 2027. 36 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)77.8#22 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
2Claude Opus 5 (High)71.8#16 (Claude Opus 5)
3Claude Opus 5 (xHigh)71.7#16 (Claude Opus 5)
4GPT-5.6 Sol (High)59.8#22 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
5Claude Opus 5 (Medium)58.1#16 (Claude Opus 5)
6Grok 4.6 (xHigh)56.5#29 (Grok 4.6)
7Grok 4.6 (High)55#29 (Grok 4.6)
8Grok 4.6 (Medium)52.6#29 (Grok 4.6)
9GPT-5.6 Terra (xHigh)50.7#40 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
10Grok 4.5 (High)50.1#54 (Grok 4.5)
11Grok 4.5 (Medium)48.9#54 (Grok 4.5)
12Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)46.9#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
13Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)41.3#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
14Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)38.5#30 (Gemini 3.8 Flash)
15Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Medium)34.8#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=petribench-hard · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.