Personal Coding Evals (core10): leaderboard

One engineer's 10 coding tasks taken from his daily work, each run three times per harness, model and effort configuration (Pi, Codex, Claude Code, DeepSeek Harness); the score is the share of the 30 runs solved. It is a personal, saturated suite (16 of 33 admitted configurations solve every run), not a general coding benchmark.

Metric: pass@1: mean solve rate over 10 personal coding tasks x 3 runs (%). Source: ibragim.dev. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 33 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-6 Astra (Low)100#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
2GPT-6.1 Sol (High)100#10 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
3GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)100#10 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
4Claude Opus 5.5 (High)100#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
5Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)100#65 (Claude Haiku 5.5)
6GPT-6 Luna (xHigh)100#95 (GPT-6 Luna)
7GPT-6 Sol (Medium)100#25 (GPT-6 Sol)
8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) (High)100#39 (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017))
9Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium)100#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
10Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High)100#19 (Claude Sonnet 5.5)
11Claude Opus 5.5 (Low)100#5 (Claude Opus 5.5)
12GLM-5.3 Flash (Max)96.7#122 (GLM-5.3 Flash)
13Claude Opus 5 (High)96.7#22 (Claude Opus 5)
14GPT-6 Luna (Medium)96.7#95 (GPT-6 Luna)
15GPT-5.6 Sol (Medium)96.7#30 (GPT-5.6 Sol)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=personal-coding-evals-core10 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.