PerSo - Intent: leaderboard

Table 5; 200 ChangeMyView threads; behavioral pair choice or 400 four-option cognitive instances per dimension; temperature 0, top-k 1; synthetic cognitive labels generated by Gemini 2.5 Pro; not persuasion win rate. Metric: Accuracy (%). Higher is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2610.20548v1

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.680.5#89
2Gemini 2.5 Pro77.75#150
3DeepSeek V4 Pro75#99
4Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)75#144 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
5Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Thinking)74.5#144 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
6Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)73.75#250 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
7Claude Haiku 4.572.5#275
8DeepSeek V3.172#261
9DeepSeek V3.269.75#201
10Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)66.5#250 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
11Gemma 3 27B64.5#597
12Gemma 3 12B63.25#662
13Qwen 3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)60.75#463 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
14Qwen 3.5 4B (Thinking)60.5#463 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
15Gemma 3 4B54.5#1074

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #7 Gemini 4 Argon.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=perso-intent · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-16.