PerSo - Behavioral: leaderboard

Table 5; 200 ChangeMyView threads; behavioral pair choice or 400 four-option cognitive instances per dimension; temperature 0, top-k 1; synthetic cognitive labels generated by Gemini 2.5 Pro; not persuasion win rate. Metric: Accuracy (%). Higher is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2610.20548v1

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)76#144 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
2Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)75#250 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
3Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Thinking)73#144 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
4Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)73#250 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
5Claude Sonnet 4.671.5#89
6Gemini 2.5 Pro71#150
7Gemma 3 27B71#597
8Claude Haiku 4.569.5#275
9DeepSeek V3.269#201
10DeepSeek V3.167.5#261
11Qwen 3.5 4B (Thinking)66.5#463 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
12Qwen 3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)64#463 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
13Gemma 3 12B62.5#662
14DeepSeek V4 Pro62#99
15Gemma 3 4B60.5#1074

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #7 Gemini 4 Argon.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=perso-behavioral · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-16.