PersistBench - Cross-Domain Leakage: leaderboard

Evaluates appropriate use of persistent memories. Cross-domain leakage and sycophancy each use 200 cases, counting failure in any of three generations; beneficial memory uses 100 cases with one generation. Lower failure is better, including failures to use beneficial memory. This series reports Cross-Domain Leakage using Failure Rate (%). Source: the original paper result table.

Metric: Failure Rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.2 (High)4#115 (GPT-5.2)
2GPT-4o13#357
3Llama 3.3 70B Instruct17.5#541
4Claude Opus 4.518#87
5MiniMax-M2.133.5#299
6DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale38#138
7Claude Sonnet 4.540#148
8GLM-4.747#202
9Kimi K2 (Thinking)49.5#252 (Kimi K2)
10Grok 4.1 Fast56.5#227
11Llama 4 Maverick59#486
12GPT-OSS-120B59.5#346
13Gemini 3 Pro59.5#82
14Kimi K2 090561.5#292
15Qwen 3 235B A22B76#323

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=persistbench-cross-domain-leakage · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.