PatternEval (Thinking): leaderboard

PatternEval (2026) collects 2,415 multimodal prompts on which model responses often fail in user-visible ways, and runs hybrid-thinking models once with thinking on and once with it off. This board is thinking inference; the score is the accuracy of the final answer under each source task's criteria as judged by Qwen3-Max, in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%; correctness of the final user-visible answer under the source task's criteria, judged by Qwen3-Max; thinking inference; PatternEval: 2,415 failure-enriched image-prompt pairs in three task families (visual perception and grounding, OCR and structured images, multimodal knowledge reasoning); official default decoding with only the reasoning control changed). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 25 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.574.9#49
2Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)73.19#178 (Kimi K2.6)
3Qwen 3.7 Max (Thinking)72.3#145 (Qwen 3.7 Max)
4GPT-5.4 (Thinking)69.54#123 (GPT-5.4)
5Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Thinking)68.93#246 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
6Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)67.7#56 (Claude Opus 4.8)
7Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)67.63#102 (Claude Opus 4.6)
8Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)67.06#256 (Kimi K2.5)
9Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Thinking)66.3#331 (Qwen 3.5 122B A10B)
10Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)65.07#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
11Qwen 3.5 27B (Thinking)64.05#359 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
12Qwen 3.6 35B A3B (Thinking)63.9#462 (Qwen 3.6 35B A3B)
13Qwen 3.6 27B (Thinking)63.72#341 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
14Qwen 3.5 9B (Thinking)59.2#803 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
15Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)55.75#559

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=patterneval-thinking · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.