PatternEval (Non-Thinking): leaderboard

PatternEval (2026) collects 2,415 multimodal prompts on which model responses often fail in user-visible ways, and runs hybrid-thinking models once with thinking on and once with it off. This board is non-thinking inference; the score is the accuracy of the final answer under each source task's criteria as judged by Qwen3-Max, in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%; correctness of the final user-visible answer under the source task's criteria, judged by Qwen3-Max; non-thinking inference; PatternEval: 2,415 failure-enriched image-prompt pairs in three task families (visual perception and grounding, OCR and structured images, multimodal knowledge reasoning); official default decoding with only the reasoning control changed). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 25 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.7 Max (Non-reasoning)67.07#145 (Qwen 3.7 Max)
2Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)66.47#178 (Kimi K2.6)
3Qwen 3.7 Plus (Non-reasoning)66.28#207 (Qwen 3.7 Plus)
4Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)61.96#246 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
5Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)61.33#256 (Kimi K2.5)
6Claude Opus 4.861.12#56
7GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)60.66#123 (GPT-5.4)
8Claude Opus 4.659.45#102
9GPT-5.5 (Non-reasoning)59.2#49 (GPT-5.5)
10Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning)59.2#331 (Qwen 3.5 122B A10B)
11Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)59.07#359 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
12Qwen 3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)57.33#341 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
13Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)57.02#482 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
14Qwen 3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)56.22#462 (Qwen 3.6 35B A3B)
15MiMo-V2.5 (Non-reasoning)55.03#354 (MiMo-V2.5)

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=patterneval-non-thinking · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.