PaperMind - Experimental Interpretation: leaderboard
Metric: Judge score for writing the analysis paragraph for an experimental figure or table given the paper's introduction, the paper's own discussion paragraph as reference; rated by a GPT-4o judge on a 5-point scale (1-5) against the reference, averaged over the seven scientific domains; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 7 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | 2.25 |
| 2 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 2.13 |
| 3 | GPT-4o Mini | 1.92 |
| 4 | Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct | 1.9 |
| 5 | Claude 3 Haiku | 1.82 |
| 6 | Gemma 3 4B (IT) | 1.73 |
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=papermind-experimental-interpretation · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.