PanCanBench - Human Curated Rubrics: leaderboard

Figure5 reproduction: same6203eligible saved responses across22models, ClaudeOpus5 judge, final human3639-item/282question rubric and separate synthetic rubric. Mean per-question percentage includes negative penalties and genuinezeros, excludes explicit NO RESPONSE GENERATED. Synthetic35interpretation/direction flags remain unadjudicated; no manual score changes. Not pooled-points percentage or the earlier3130-item manuscript draft. Human Curated Rubrics. Higher is better; negative percentages permitted by rubric penalties.

Metric: Mean rubric score (%). Source: github.com. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1O382.19#228
2Grok 481.59#307
3GPT-578.67#167
4Gemini 2.5 Flash75.54#453
5O4 Mini72.39#353
6Gemini 2.5 Pro71.86#266
7Gemma 3 27B (IT)70.49#1289
8Gemma 3 12B (IT)70.22#1837
9GPT-4.169.87#495
10OLMo 3 32B (Thinking)68.58#1884 (OLMo 3 32B)
11Qwen 3 32B66.24#960
12OLMo 3.1 32B Instruct62.88#2384
13Qwen 3 8B60.99#1830
14Qwen 3 14B59.72#1233
15Claude Opus 4.1 (20250805)54.97#257

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=pancanbench-human-curated-rubrics · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.