OVO-S-Bench: leaderboard

OVO-S-Bench (InternLM, 2026) measures streaming spatial intelligence with human-annotated multiple-choice questions over egocentric and driving videos, each answerable only from the video before its query time, across four levels from egocentric perception to allocentric mapping. This board is overall accuracy in percent, the mean of the four levels, with 128 frames sampled from the video prefix; higher is better.

Metric: Overall multiple-choice accuracy (%) on the 1,680-question evaluation set, prefix-access mode (128 frames sampled uniformly from the video before the query timestamp, question given with the frames), macro-average of the four levels. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 31 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)59.19#94
2Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B53.64#479
3Qwen 3.5 397B A17B52.1#246
4Qwen 3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)51.69#359 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
5GPT-5.450.89#123
6Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite50.81#364
7Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct48.8#585
8Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct46.83#1279
9Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)45.91#803 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
10Qwen 3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)45.4#1175 (Qwen 3.5 4B)
11Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct44.19#1833
12Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning)43.73#430 (Grok 4.1 Fast)
13Gemma 4 26B A4B42.56#615
14Gemma 4 E4B39.69#2214
15Gemma 4 E2B36.07#3892

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ovo-s-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.