ORAgentBench - Medium Feasibility: leaderboard

ORAgentBench (2026) tests LLM agents on 107 human-reviewed operations research tasks solved end to end, from multi-file operational data to a validated decision, with hidden validators for feasibility and objective quality; the agents run in the Claude Code or Codex harness. This board is the mean feasibility (0-100) on the 41 medium tasks: the share of submissions that meet the schema and hard operational constraints; higher is better.

Metric: Mean feasibility (0-100) on the 41 medium tasks: share of submissions that satisfy the schema, domains and hard operational constraints; end-to-end operations research tasks packaged with multi-file operational data, configuration and a submission schema; the agent writes and runs solver code in an isolated Harbor environment (45-minute interaction budget, 5-minute solve limit) and hidden validators score schema and hard-constraint feasibility and normalized objective quality; printed 0-1 and x100 here; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.4 (High)68#123 (GPT-5.4)
2GPT-5.3 Codex (High)68#116 (GPT-5.3 Codex)
3Claude Opus 4.659#102
4GPT-5.4 Mini (High)54#389 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
5Claude Sonnet 4.651#161
6Kimi K2.651#178
7DeepSeek V4 Pro46#188
8GLM-5.146#179
9MiMo-V2.5-Pro46#279
10DeepSeek V4 Flash41#258
11GLM-534#260
12Qwen 3.6 Plus29#222
13Qwen 3.5 Plus24#232
14MiniMax-M2.720#518

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=oragentbench-medium-feasibility · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.