ORAgentBench - Medium: leaderboard

ORAgentBench (2026) tests LLM agents on 107 human-reviewed operations research tasks solved end to end, from multi-file operational data to a validated decision, with hidden validators for feasibility and objective quality; the agents run in the Claude Code or Codex harness. This board is the pass rate (%) on the 41 medium tasks, where a pass needs a feasible submission with normalized quality of at least 0.4; higher is better.

Metric: Pass rate (%) on the 41 medium tasks: a task passes when the submission is feasible and its normalized quality reaches 0.4; end-to-end operations research tasks packaged with multi-file operational data, configuration and a submission schema; the agent writes and runs solver code in an isolated Harbor environment (45-minute interaction budget, 5-minute solve limit) and hidden validators score schema and hard-constraint feasibility and normalized objective quality; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.3 Codex (High)43.9#116 (GPT-5.3 Codex)
2Claude Opus 4.639.02#102
3GPT-5.4 (High)39.02#123 (GPT-5.4)
4Kimi K2.636.59#178
5GLM-5.131.71#179
6Claude Sonnet 4.629.27#161
7GPT-5.4 Mini (High)29.27#389 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
8DeepSeek V4 Pro28.46#188
9DeepSeek V4 Flash26.83#258
10GLM-524.39#260
11Qwen 3.6 Plus21.95#222
12MiMo-V2.5-Pro21.95#279
13Qwen 3.5 Plus14.63#232
14MiniMax-M2.72.44#518

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=oragentbench-medium · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.