Opus Magnum Bench: leaderboard

Alchemy-machine construction on 36 campaign puzzles. The primary leaderboard takes the best solved reward per puzzle across published runs, then averages over all 36 puzzles. Reward is human-best cost plus cycles plus area divided by the solution total, capped at one; scores are percentages. Historical corrected trials follow current solved rewards, and evaluated zero-score models remain present. Run coverage differs between models; this is not pass@1.

Metric: Human-normalized score (%). Source: opusmagnumbench.com. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 23 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)70.86#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
2Claude Fable 5 (High)60.15#16 (Claude Fable 5)
3GPT-5.5 (xHigh)53.86#31 (GPT-5.5)
4Claude Fable 5 (Low)49.28#16 (Claude Fable 5)
5GPT-5.6 Terra (xHigh)47.72#41 (GPT-5.6 Terra)
6GPT-5.5 (Medium)37.86#31 (GPT-5.5)
7Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (High)31.11#58 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
8Claude Sonnet 5 (High)26.55#57 (Claude Sonnet 5)
9GLM-5.2 (High)25.39#73 (GLM-5.2)
10Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)24.49#60 (Gemini 3.5 Flash)
11Claude Opus 4.8 (High)22.81#37 (Claude Opus 4.8)
12Grok 4.5 (High)18.19#48 (Grok 4.5)
13GPT-5.6 Luna (xHigh)17.8#68 (GPT-5.6 Luna)
14Gemini 3 Flash (Preview) (High)15.39#82 (Gemini 3 Flash (Preview))
15DeepSeek V4 Pro13.39#102

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=opus-magnum-bench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.