One Word, Different Action - Atomic Accuracy: leaderboard

One Word, Different Action (2026) grounds language instructions in 85 physical decision anchors recorded with a real robot, and the model must return the one executable decision an instruction implies. This board covers 3,952 atomic instances that each apply a single constraint: action inhibition, set exclusion, cardinality or temporal ordering. Exact-match accuracy in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Executable-decision accuracy (%; exact match of the executable decision (object, object set or ordered action sequence) against deterministic ground truth over 85 physical decision anchors collected with a real robot; 3,952 atomic instances in 988 task families, one constraint each (inhibition, exclusion, cardinality or temporal ordering); temperature 0, at most 512 new tokens, no chain of thought requested; an unmappable output counts as wrong). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 4 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GLM-5 FP899.4#260
2Mistral 7B Instruct (v0.3)97.8#6698
3OLMo-2-1124-7B-Instruct87.8#7377
4Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct84.4#2583

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=one-word-different-action-atomic-accuracy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.