OmniCompass-VL - Temporal Grounding - Consistency Score: leaderboard

OmniCompass-VL - Temporal Grounding - Consistency Score. Matched text-only/text-plus-image target specifications; consistency requires both target forms correct. 820 visual-language videos, 2460 task instances. Source-specific frame budgets retained in primary table; no fusion with single-condition accuracy. Metric: Consistency score (%). Primary published table; source configurations remain distinct.

Metric: Consistency score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2032. 36 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.8 Flash27.1#21
2Qwen 3.8 Max26.7#31
3GPT-6 Astra26.3#5
4Qwen 3.5 122B A10B24.3#169
5Qwen 3.8 Flash24.1#45
6Qwen 3.5 397B A17B23.1#144
7Kimi K322.6#30
8GPT-5.6 Sol22.2#18
9Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct21.6#267
10GPT-5.521.3#32
11Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)19.3#56
12GPT-5.6 Terra19.3#42
13GPT-5.6 Luna19.2#69
14GLM-5.3 Flash18.3#66
15Qwen 3.5 27B17.4#183

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #7 Gemini 4 Argon, #8 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=omnicompass-vl-temporal-grounding-consistency-score · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-16.