OmniCompass-VL - Spatial Grounding - Consistency Score: leaderboard

OmniCompass-VL - Spatial Grounding - Consistency Score. Matched text-only/text-plus-image target specifications; consistency requires both target forms correct. 820 visual-language videos, 2460 task instances. Source-specific frame budgets retained in primary table; no fusion with single-condition accuracy. Metric: Consistency score (%). Primary published table; source configurations remain distinct.

Metric: Consistency score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2031. 36 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-6 Astra32.7#5
2Gemini 3.8 Flash32.3#21
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)31.8#56
4Kimi K328.4#30
5Qwen 3.5 397B A17B28#144
6GPT-5.6 Sol28#18
7GPT-5.6 Luna26.8#69
8Qwen 3.8 Max26.7#31
9Qwen 3.8 Flash22.6#45
10Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct20.9#267
11Qwen 3.6 35B A3B20.9#217
12Qwen 3.5 122B A10B20.8#169
13GPT-5.520.7#32
14GPT-5.6 Terra20.1#42
15Qwen 3.5 9B17.7#367

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #7 Gemini 4 Argon, #8 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=omnicompass-vl-spatial-grounding-consistency-score · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-16.