OmniaBench - Solver: leaderboard

Selection, scheduling, allocation and optimization tasks that an agent must solve through environment tools; from OmniaBench (2026). Pass@1 in percent, a task counts only if every rubric item is met; higher is better.

Metric: Pass@1 (%; 60 selection, scheduling, allocation and optimization tasks synthesized with solver guidance; a task counts as solved only when every rubric item is satisfied (Program tasks by a VerifyCode check); up to 200 tool-call steps; challenging set of 644 tasks evaluated June 29 to July 15, 2026). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 22 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol (High)65#30 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
2Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)56.67#111 (Claude Sonnet 5)
3Qwen 3.7 Max (Thinking)51.67#145 (Qwen 3.7 Max)
4Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)45#178 (Kimi K2.6)
5Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)43.33#79 (Claude Opus 4.7)
6GPT-5.5 (High)38.33#49 (GPT-5.5)
7DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)36.67#188 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
8Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)36.67#101 (Gemini 3.5 Flash)
9Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)35#94
10Qwen 3.5 397B A17B31.67#246
11Qwen 3.6 27B28.33#341
12DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)28.33#258 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)
13GLM-5.2 (Max)26.67#138 (GLM-5.2)
14Qwen 3.5 35B A3B25#482
15Qwen 3.6 35B A3B20#462

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=omniabench-solver · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.