Omni2Web - Direct Editing Revision Handling: leaderboard

The revision-handling component of Omni2Web direct editing (Han et al., 2026): the share of revision and undo steps honoured in the final page, over 918 bilingual screen recordings of weakly referential web-editing requests, where speech, cursor movement and edit history identify the targets. Percent, judged by Gemini 3.1 Pro; higher is better.

Metric: Revision-handling rate (%; Track A rubric items: revision and undo steps are honoured in the final page; 918 bilingual screen recordings of weakly referential webpage edit requests (speech plus cursor), 13,907 edit steps; the model edits the source HTML directly from the recording under its native input interface (omni: audio-visual video; vision-language: video or 1 fps frames plus manual transcript); rubric items judged by Gemini 3.1 Pro; unusable outputs score zero). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.5 Flash71.26#98
2GPT-5.6 Sol63.49#29
3Claude Opus 561.67#20
4Seed 2.1 Pro57.03#133
5Kimi K356.59#53
6Qwen 3.8 Max55.77#55
7Grok 4.651.43#44
8MiniMax-M350.87#265
9Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)41.67#91
10MiMo-V2.539.81#353
11Seed 2.0 Lite38.87#286
12Muse Spark 1.137.91#82
13Qwen 3.5 Omni Plus32.28#237
14Qwen 3.8 27B26.74#199

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=omni2web-direct-editing-revision-handling · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.