Omni2Web - Direct Editing Fulfillment: leaderboard

The edit-fulfilment component of Omni2Web direct editing (Han et al., 2026): the share of rubric items whose requested change is actually realised in the edited HTML, over 918 bilingual screen recordings of weakly referential web-editing requests, where speech, cursor movement and edit history identify the targets. Percent, judged by Gemini 3.1 Pro; higher is better.

Metric: Edit-fulfillment rate (%; Track A rubric items: each active step's requested change is realised in the edited HTML; 918 bilingual screen recordings of weakly referential webpage edit requests (speech plus cursor), 13,907 edit steps; the model edits the source HTML directly from the recording under its native input interface (omni: audio-visual video; vision-language: video or 1 fps frames plus manual transcript); rubric items judged by Gemini 3.1 Pro; unusable outputs score zero). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.5 Flash40.52#98
2Claude Opus 538.9#20
3GPT-5.6 Sol37.32#29
4Kimi K330.26#53
5Grok 4.629.92#44
6Qwen 3.8 Max27.59#55
7Seed 2.1 Pro23.67#133
8MiniMax-M318.83#265
9MiMo-V2.517.93#353
10Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)16.46#91
11Qwen 3.5 Omni Plus11.86#237
12Seed 2.0 Lite11.7#286
13Muse Spark 1.110.14#82
14Qwen 3.8 27B7.56#199

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=omni2web-direct-editing-fulfillment · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.