Olmo 3 Safety Evaluation - StrongREJECT: leaderboard

The model gets about 2,300 forbidden requests, each wrapped in one of 37 jailbreak techniques or none; the StrongREJECT judge rates harmfulness 1-5 and the score reverses it to 0-100, higher meaning safer. Unlike HarmBench, it scores how useful the harmful answer would be, not only whether the model refused.

Metric: Safety score (reversed StrongREJECT judge score, 0-100, 2,294 jailbreak prompts, higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. 36 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct-SFT95.5#3407
2OLMo 3.1 32B Instruct91.7#2384
3OLMo-3.1 32B Think90.5#1443
4Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct90.2#585
5OLMo-2-1124-7B-Instruct89.4#7343
6Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct-DPO89.3#3174
7Qwen 3 VL 32B (Thinking)88.5#559
8Gemma 2 27B (IT)88.1#1782
9OLMo 3 7B Instruct88.1#6860
10OLMo-2-0325-32B-Instruct87.4#2570
11Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)86.9#960 (Qwen 3 32B)
12Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct85.6#1215
13NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V285.6#2270
14Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct85.3#981
15Gemma 3 27B (IT)84.6#1289

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=olmo-3-safety-evaluation-strongreject · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.