Olmo 3 Safety Evaluation - HarmBench: leaderboard

The model gets 320 HarmBench harmful prompts (standard, copyright and contextual) with no attack; the score is the share of responses WildGuard labels safe. Unlike HarmBench's own board, which ranks attacks against models, this is direct requests only.

Metric: Safe responses (%, 320 harmful prompts, WildGuard safety label, higher is better). Source: arxiv.org. 36 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1OLMo 3.1 32B Instruct96#2384
2OLMo 3 7B Instruct94.9#6860
3Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct-DPO93.9#3174
4Gemma 2 27B (IT)90.8#1782
5Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct-SFT90.5#3407
6OLMo-3.1 32B Think89.7#1443
7OLMo-2-0325-32B-Instruct89#2570
8OLMo-2-1124-7B-Instruct88.8#7343
9Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct87.9#1215
10Granite 3.3 8B Instruct86.3#3615
11Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct84.6#981
12Apertus-70B-Instruct-250984.4#2639
13Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)81.9#887
14Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct80.6#585
15Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct80.1#2564

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=olmo-3-safety-evaluation-harmbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.