OCR-MetaReasoning - RPCS: leaderboard

OCR-MetaReasoning Reasoning Process Compliance Score: mean RPCS over deductive, inductive and abductive items, built from process criteria for capability match, groundedness, step completeness and non-hallucination (arXiv 2608.30678v1, Table 3 AVG. column). Percentage points, higher is better; it scores the reasoning process, not the answer; reasoning modes follow the paper's Table 24.

Metric: Reasoning Process Compliance Score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)96.2#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
2GPT-5.4 (Medium)95.2#83 (GPT-5.4)
3GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)92.5#83 (GPT-5.4)
4Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)91.9#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
5Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)91.1#152 (Kimi K2.5)
6Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)89.6#236
7GPT-5.4 Mini (Medium)88.9#228 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
8Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct87#280
9Grok 4.20 (Non-reasoning)85.7#179 (Grok 4.20)
10Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)84.4#348
11GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)84.1#330 (GLM-4.6V)
12Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)82.7#423
13GPT-5.4 Mini (Non-reasoning)81.4#228 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
14Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct76.3#390
15Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct72.5#419

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ocr-metareasoning-rpcs · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.