OCR-MetaReasoning - Meta-Inductive: leaderboard

OCR-MetaReasoning answer score on inductive meta-reasoning items over text-rich images (arXiv 2608.30678v1, Table 2); MRMS averages the three reasoning types. Percentage (100 times the normalized score), higher is better; reasoning modes follow the paper's Table 24.

Metric: Answer Score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)93.1#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
2GPT-5.4 (Medium)91.5#83 (GPT-5.4)
3Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)87.8#236
4Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)87.6#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
5GPT-5.4 Mini (Medium)87.2#228 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
6GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)85.7#83 (GPT-5.4)
7Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)84.6#152 (Kimi K2.5)
8Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)81.8#348
9Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct80.9#280
10Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)79.5#423
11GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)79.2#330 (GLM-4.6V)
12Grok 4.20 (Non-reasoning)77.4#179 (Grok 4.20)
13GPT-5.4 Mini (Non-reasoning)75.3#228 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
14Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct67.9#390
15Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct60.5#419

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ocr-metareasoning-meta-inductive · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.