OCR-MetaReasoning - Meta-Abductive: leaderboard

OCR-MetaReasoning answer score on abductive meta-reasoning items over text-rich images (arXiv 2608.30678v1, Table 2); MRMS averages the three reasoning types. Percentage (100 times the normalized score), higher is better; reasoning modes follow the paper's Table 24.

Metric: Answer Score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)94.1#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
2GPT-5.4 (Medium)90.8#83 (GPT-5.4)
3Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)87.9#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
4GPT-5.4 Mini (Medium)87.1#228 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
5GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)85.5#83 (GPT-5.4)
6Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)82.5#152 (Kimi K2.5)
7Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)82.1#236
8Grok 4.20 (Non-reasoning)78#179 (Grok 4.20)
9Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct77.7#280
10GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)76.3#330 (GLM-4.6V)
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)73.6#423
12Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)73.3#348
13GPT-5.4 Mini (Non-reasoning)70.1#228 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
14Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct63.2#390
15Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct57.6#419

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ocr-metareasoning-meta-abductive · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.