OCR-MetaReasoning - Layout Semantics: leaderboard

OCR-MetaReasoning answer score on the layout semantics OCR-object category of its text-rich image questions (arXiv 2608.30678v1, Table 2). Percentage (100 times the normalized score), higher is better; reasoning modes follow the paper's Table 24.

Metric: Answer Score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.4 (Medium)77.6#83 (GPT-5.4)
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)76.2#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
3GPT-5.4 Mini (Medium)73.6#228 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
4Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)70.2#152 (Kimi K2.5)
5Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)69.9#94 (Claude Sonnet 4.6)
6Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct69.5#280
7Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B (Thinking)69.2#236
8GPT-5.4 (Non-reasoning)69.1#83 (GPT-5.4)
9Grok 4.20 (Non-reasoning)61.9#179 (Grok 4.20)
10GPT-5.4 Mini (Non-reasoning)61#228 (GPT-5.4 Mini)
11Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)60.6#423
12Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking)60.5#348
13GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)60.3#330 (GLM-4.6V)
14Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct55.1#390
15Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct49.9#419

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=ocr-metareasoning-layout-semantics · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.