OccuBench (Explicit Faults): leaderboard

Metric: Completion rate (%) over all 382 tasks when the simulator injects explicit faults (HTTP 500, timeouts; E1, two transient fault events of two calls each); 382 tool-use task instances from 100 professional scenarios, the environment simulated by Gemini-3-Flash-Preview and each trajectory passed or failed by a rubric verifier; thinking mode on, high reasoning effort where configurable; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1GPT-5.2 (High)75.9
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)73.3
3Claude Opus 4.6 (High)68.1
4Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Thinking)62.8
5Qwen 3.5 Plus (Thinking)61
6DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)59.9
7GLM-5 (Thinking)59.4
8MiniMax-M2.752.9
9Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)50

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=occubench-explicit-faults · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-07.