NOLLI - Average: leaderboard

NOLLI (arXiv 2608.04397v1, Table 2): procedurally generated, uniquely solvable English-Korean logic puzzles for 15 models, accuracy pooled over three difficulty tiers calibrated on a reference model. Macro average over all 25 tasks (15 puzzle types across languages); percent, higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%; 25-task macro average). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.5 (Medium)84.9#33 (GPT-5.5)
2Claude Opus 4.8 (Medium)78.3#39 (Claude Opus 4.8)
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Medium)73.6#64 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
4Qwen 3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)62.5#154 (Qwen 3.5 397B A17B)
5Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)48.3#178 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
6GPT-OSS-120B (Medium)47.7#346 (GPT-OSS-120B)
7DeepSeek V4 Flash45.8#155
8Qwen 3.5 27B44.4#192
9Qwen 3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)32.5#391 (Qwen 3.5 9B)
10EXAONE 4.0 32B (Thinking)25.1#615 (EXAONE 4.0 32B)
11Llama 4 Maverick14.4#486
12Solar Open 100B14.1#415
13Llama 3.1 8B Instruct1.5#1017

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nolli-average · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.